Our diligence method

A disciplined path from pitch to investment decision.

We organize fragmented records, test the economics, challenge the story and verify operations on the ground. Then we connect every material finding to what the investor should do.

Scope → Build → Test → Verify → Decide

Each stage earns the right to the next.

The depth changes with the mandate. The evidence chain does not.

Scope the decision

What must the investor know, and what could stop or reshape the transaction?

We begin with the mandate, proposed instrument, use of funds and IC concerns. The assignment becomes a small number of falsifiable questions and killer risks.

OutputDecision brief, killer-risk map, evidence standard and tailored diligence plan.

Build the evidence base

Do we have the right records, for the right entities and periods?

Files are inventoried, normalized and mapped to decision questions. Missing, duplicate and contradictory evidence is surfaced early.

OutputEvidence map, data-readiness assessment and controlled request tracker.

Test the claims

Does the cash, model, market and operating logic support the story?

We reconcile primary records, reconstruct unit economics, stress-test the transaction and compare statements across documents and interviews.

OutputIndependent analysis, contradiction register, interview plan and preliminary thesis.

Verify independently

Does physical and stakeholder evidence support the investment model?

Management and selected stakeholders are interviewed separately. Where required, fieldwork tests assets, inventory, staffing, throughput and operating constraints.

OutputInterview evidence, site findings and updated financial and operating tests.

Decide with conditions

Should the investor proceed, restructure or stop?

Verified facts, contradictions and unknowns are connected to material risks. The recommendation specifies mitigants, conditions precedent, covenants and monitoring.

OutputIC-ready memorandum, risk matrix, protections and live decision-team readout.

A controlled AI-native model

Technology carries the workflow. People remain accountable for the judgment.

Evidence intakeSystems inventory, extract and validate. Professionals decide whether the records are authentic and sufficient.

InvestigationModels reconcile and agents challenge. Engagement professionals lead interviews, follow-up and field verification.

DecisionQuality controls test coverage and consistency. The principal owns materiality, residual risk and the final recommendation.

Engagement options

Buy the depth of decision support the mandate requires.

Every offering has a repeatable shape, explicit boundary and decision-grade output. Scope and commercial terms are proposed after an initial mandate discussion.

Decision Screen

Is this opportunity worth deeper diligence?

Rapid reviewDecision brief and next-stage plan

Core opportunity, financial, market and management review focused on killer risks.

Output: concise decision brief with thesis, risks and recommended next step.

Focused Verification

Is one investment-critical claim true?

Bounded workstreamEvidence and investment implication

One defined financial, operating, market or stakeholder question with an explicit evidence standard.

Output: evidence memo with answer, limitations and required mitigants.

Full Investment Due Diligence

Should we invest, how and subject to what protections?

Integrated diligenceIC-ready recommendation

Integrated financial, commercial, operational, team and impact diligence.

Output: IC-ready memo, evidence trail, risk matrix, conditions and live readout.

Portfolio Monitoring

Are performance and risk evolving as the investment case expected?

Post-investment reviewEvidence, variances and actions

Periodic tracking of agreed financial, operational and impact indicators, supported by evidence-led variance review.

Output: monitoring brief with KPI evidence, emerging risks, unresolved questions and recommended follow-up.

Retained Investment Desk

Add East Africa capacity without building a permanent local team.

Reserved capacityPipeline and priority support

Pipeline triage, rapid screens, diligence design and ongoing risk discussion.

Boundary: full diligence, travel, site work and specialist opinions are separately scoped.

The result

More than a report: a traceable investment decision.

Financial verification, operational ground truth and IC-ready judgment, connected to the structure and protections of the transaction.

Discuss a mandate Back to overview